Hi, sorry about the one line comment
Take a look at the last 3 versions (excluding your new one here):
1:
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/818/newyorkb.jpg/2:
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/24/newyorkwq.jpg/3:
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/39/newyorko.jpg/1 is a really nice colour scheme: happy and bright.
Its just that its a bit too bright for the eyes - you shouldnt look to long at it.
2 is alot less bright, alot less 'happy', but still quite good.
3 has a good colour scheme, but it lost all happiness. It looks so dark and grey. The see is, instead of light blue with white lins, just a weird, sad tan of blue.
I know, 1 is a bit unprofessional, bunch of random bright colours put together, but it really has a feeling to the map that the author was happy creating it
The 3rd version has alot more professional colours, but it lost the main thing, which is the feeling the other 2 ones had.
Its a bit with the same thing when pntbttr restarted his colour scheme on europe - it made me think it rained all the time in europe.
He didnt threw away all the colours though, he just adjusted them, and made them look relly nice. So I'll hope you can do that with these colours too.
Now, you already did a nice job with the new ocean. Its not just boring plain tan blue, but it has a good texture and some colour mixers. Could you try something with that on the land as well?
The regions im most worried about are the light blue ones (top and left), because they look alot the same as the sea - always the difficulty with a blue sea.
So yeah, I dont like the new map, but that doesnt mean its bad - it just needs a little tune up i guess
Looking forward to more changes!
Hi, sorry about the one line comment :S
Take a look at the last 3 versions (excluding your new one here):
1: http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/818/newyorkb.jpg/
2: http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/24/newyorkwq.jpg/
3: http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/39/newyorko.jpg/
1 is a really nice colour scheme: happy and bright.
Its just that its a bit too bright for the eyes - you shouldnt look to long at it.
2 is alot less bright, alot less 'happy', but still quite good.
3 has a good colour scheme, but it lost all happiness. It looks so dark and grey. The see is, instead of light blue with white lins, just a weird, sad tan of blue.
I know, 1 is a bit unprofessional, bunch of random bright colours put together, but it really has a feeling to the map that the author was happy creating it
The 3rd version has alot more professional colours, but it lost the main thing, which is the feeling the other 2 ones had.
Its a bit with the same thing when pntbttr restarted his colour scheme on europe - it made me think it rained all the time in europe.
He didnt threw away all the colours though, he just adjusted them, and made them look relly nice. So I'll hope you can do that with these colours too.
Now, you already did a nice job with the new ocean. Its not just boring plain tan blue, but it has a good texture and some colour mixers. Could you try something with that on the land as well?
The regions im most worried about are the light blue ones (top and left), because they look alot the same as the sea - always the difficulty with a blue sea.
So yeah, I dont like the new map, but that doesnt mean its bad - it just needs a little tune up i guess :)
Looking forward to more changes!
"Strength doesn't lie in numbers, strength doesn't lie in wealth. Strength lies in nights of peaceful slumbers." ~Maria