I'm generally opposed to lynching an inactive player on the first (& second?) lynch, as that gives no new information (other than his/her role) - but there's no leads that can be drawn from it -> to find the next lynch target.
What would be ideal, I guess, would be to have 2 or 3 main lynch targets and 1 of them getting lynched - then hopefully find some 'gangs' in the group of voters. This is ofc also next to impossible for the 2nd day..... but with many days, it should, normally lead to more info than taking down inactives
On the other hand, if we do lynch an inactive and s/he turns out to be mafia - you guys might (righteously) have your scopes at me =D
-Alex
PS - sorry....... seems I used a bad word...... really not my intent....... they just slip through.. I don't really censor myself so much, free speech and all that (I see no real wrong in single words - I can see wrong in context of grouped words).
Having said that... I'll make a new topic for a suggestion to implement a censor/filter that'll just do it automatically. If someone uses one of the predefined words (e.g. sh!t - but without censor) it gets censored automatically..... - i've seen these elsewhere, so I assume it should be relatively easy to implement - if people agree that there's use in such an addition leaving less of a nasty aftertaste to those who would normally feel offended by it - reducing the everyday workload of crew and reducing the agony of players who see their chat score reduced, while not really being aware of doing anything really wrong.....
I'm generally opposed to lynching an inactive player on the first (& second?) lynch, as that gives no new information (other than his/her role) - but there's no leads that can be drawn from it -> to find the next lynch target.
What would be ideal, I guess, would be to have 2 or 3 main lynch targets and 1 of them getting lynched - then hopefully find some 'gangs' in the group of voters. This is ofc also next to impossible for the 2nd day..... but with many days, it should, normally lead to more info than taking down inactives :3
On the other hand, if we do lynch an inactive and s/he turns out to be mafia - you guys might (righteously) have your scopes at me =D
-Alex
[i]PS - sorry....... seems I used a bad word...... really not my intent....... they just slip through.. I don't really censor myself so much, free speech and all that (I see no real wrong in single words - I can see wrong in context of grouped words).
Having said that... I'll make a new topic for a suggestion to implement a censor/filter that'll just do it automatically. If someone uses one of the predefined words (e.g. sh!t - but without censor) it gets censored automatically..... - i've seen these elsewhere, so I assume it should be relatively easy to implement - if people agree that there's use in such an addition leaving less of a nasty aftertaste to those who would normally feel offended by it - reducing the everyday workload of crew and reducing the agony of players who see their chat score reduced, while not really being aware of doing anything really wrong.....[/i]
“Gravitation cannot be held responsible for people falling in love. How on earth can you explain in terms of chemistry and physics so important a biological phenomenon as first love? Put your hand on a stove for a minute and it seems like an hour. Sit with that special girl for an hour and it seems like a minute. That's relativity.”
― Albert Einstein
