Map Dabble

chicago ,the font and the letters look blurry to me and or its just me and my eyesight maybe you could make a little nicer planes, these look simple to me, they can also pass if there are no better ones... pure color without these background squares would be better, wouldnt it? everything else is excellent from my point of view dragonport the ports can definitely be placed in better places due to both the maps vision and gameplay red on yelow territory or grey yelow on most visible territory redish maybe etc

chicago is really blurry yup. it didnt convert well from my paint program, i was looking at it in a magnified view and as soon as i posted it i noticed. im not happy with dragonport either after posting it. sometimes things look much better in the paint program than it does afterwards. ill try again when i get some motivation/inspiration.

changed the dragons around for more contrast between the crystals and land they are on. lessened the opacity of the trees, probably could get rid of them, as they are decoration. [spoiler][img]https://mapconquest.com/images/dabble/dragonmap.jpg[/img][/spoiler]

Yes now is good ,but those names ruby .garnet and emerald is names of dragons?

[quote=Blagoje_Jovovic]Yes now is good ,but those names ruby .garnet and emerald is names of dragons? [/quote] As suggested by Bishop, to make the dragons a territory

Hey Hood! Please, do you think you could make a playable map out of this? (I quote myself from another thread) [quote=The_Bishop]The last #3 idea is evolving into something like this: [spoiler=#3 Gulf Coast, U.S. (42-44 tert's)][img]https://i.ibb.co/rK64cCR3/Gulf-Coast-02.jpg[/img][/spoiler] Austin is intended to not belong to any region. Mexico maybe playing maybe not. 3 or 4 ports, I don't know yet...[/quote]

[quote=The_Bishop]Hey Hood! Please, do you think you could make a playable map out of this? (I quote myself from another thread) [quote=The_Bishop]The last #3 idea is evolving into something like this: [spoiler=#3 Gulf Coast, U.S. (42-44 tert's)][img]https://i.ibb.co/rK64cCR3/Gulf-Coast-02.jpg[/img][/spoiler] Austin is intended to not belong to any region. Mexico maybe playing maybe not. 3 or 4 ports, I don't know yet...[/quote] [/quote] ill play around with it this weekend maybe

There is also a small slice of South Carolina included in the map, I would attach it to Georgia. This would compensate a piece of Georgia that I gifted to Alabama in order to fit the region lands with the actual river run. I think it is wiser (when we can) to cheat region borders rather than cheat river runs: political borders changes more often than how rivers change.

I liked also the Chicago city map idea (60 territories not great tho, maybe can be reduced to 56).

hoodlum, i have a question on some bonuses; they seem to be unequal. [img]https://i.imgur.com/86YbF4c.jpeg [/img] also, is it add additional bonuses for holding the big islands? maybe +2 for the two smaller ones in the north and east. +3 for the one north west, +4 for the one south west and +8 for the biggest one? it would fit so well with the island structure of the gameplay area and wont add too much complexity at all, bit at the same time enrich the gameplay when playing capped games. i also like the design & colors and the overall structure of the map. regarding design its better than nga toa and better than bulgaria. i would rank this first, then bulgaria and the nga toa. bishop will have a lot of work adding all the new maps....