maafi
Putting aside the argument as to whether this really represents the best players of the last month, is everyone happy with the frequency? Does it feel like it comes around too often?
To me, I like the idea which you pitched earlier, regarding consistency; setup games every month.
This would get game-data-input for the D12 game of Feb from Jan and the March D12 game from Feb, etc. ~provided the games finish timely.
I'm however also perfectly fine with making it 2 months? Or any other constant interval (or even something less bounded ;d). That said; once/month doesn't strike me as too often.
maafi
But I think that needs to be tougher such as finishing 5 games in 15 days. Or tougher still: How about a minimum of 2 different game types, a minimum amount of maps and how about at least one live and one long LT game?
~Not sure whether that actually leads to 'better/more dominating' players to be selected - it'll make it tougher though; as people need to play more games (and especially for non-premium players, this could be a bottleneck). Not sure whether activity should be a main driver as selection criterium. Changing from playing 5 in 15, to finishing 10 in 30 already feels more 'soft' of a change. As for how well it represents what you guys intend it to represent... I guess that's rather hard. If you wish to change it, there'll be some kind of comparing apples with pears... (maps/LT/types - there's 1v1, caps, assass etc tournaments) - anyway, I notice my writing becomes less and less comprehensible, more of a clutter :d
I like the spark
TP_knighty initiated and the response
Matty gave; creating another list based on a different formula:
https://dominating12.com/forums/6/suggestions-feedback/3107/best-monthly-performer/post/54642#post-54642 - provided there is (enough) desire from the community/staff to alter stuff (and time/willingness to code it).
For now, I mostly just replied to acknowledge that I read it :p I'll probably be ok with whatever gets decided upon (or voice myself more elaborately before the fat lady sings)
-Alex
[quote=maafi]Putting aside the argument as to whether this really represents the best players of the last month, is everyone happy with the frequency? Does it feel like it comes around too often?[/quote]
To me, I like the idea which you pitched earlier, regarding consistency; setup games every month.
This would get game-data-input for the D12 game of Feb from Jan and the March D12 game from Feb, etc. ~provided the games finish timely.
I'm however also perfectly fine with making it 2 months? Or any other constant interval (or even something less bounded ;d). That said; once/month doesn't strike me as too often.
[quote=maafi]But I think that needs to be tougher such as finishing 5 games in 15 days. Or tougher still: How about a minimum of 2 different game types, a minimum amount of maps and how about at least one live and one long LT game? [/quote]
~Not sure whether that actually leads to 'better/more dominating' players to be selected - it'll make it tougher though; as people need to play more games (and especially for non-premium players, this could be a bottleneck). Not sure whether activity should be a main driver as selection criterium. Changing from playing 5 in 15, to finishing 10 in 30 already feels more 'soft' of a change. As for how well it represents what you guys intend it to represent... I guess that's rather hard. If you wish to change it, there'll be some kind of comparing apples with pears... (maps/LT/types - there's 1v1, caps, assass etc tournaments) - anyway, I notice my writing becomes less and less comprehensible, more of a clutter :d
I like the spark [user]TP_knighty[/user] initiated and the response [user]Matty[/user] gave; creating another list based on a different formula: https://dominating12.com/forums/6/suggestions-feedback/3107/best-monthly-performer/post/54642#post-54642 - provided there is (enough) desire from the community/staff to alter stuff (and time/willingness to code it).
For now, I mostly just replied to acknowledge that I read it :p I'll probably be ok with whatever gets decided upon (or voice myself more elaborately before the fat lady sings)
-Alex
“Gravitation cannot be held responsible for people falling in love. How on earth can you explain in terms of chemistry and physics so important a biological phenomenon as first love? Put your hand on a stove for a minute and it seems like an hour. Sit with that special girl for an hour and it seems like a minute. That's relativity.”
― Albert Einstein
