Narcos Mafia Game - It's On

I cant spend a single chill day on this website

Not after your multiple infamous wins as a neutral in the past :)

[quote=Virtuosity98]@orz they should say it like [b]#UNLYNCH [PLAYER NAME][/b] but they are just saying it in a non-standard way. To help the mod though it would be good if they used the right terminology, for consistency's sake. I voted Anax because not only did he not post once in the thread but also didn't reply to my PM. I know it's not a real reason but an "inactive" Anax (or one who claims to be inactive) is a scary thought, as many of the old-timers will recall. There's a 13/15 chance Anax is not in my cartel so I'm fine with a blind lynch based on fear of a very clever player who is trying to slip under the radar this time. [/quote] These are all points I agree with. For those of you who are newer, Anax is a dangerous man.

or if you have already voted and change your mind then [b]#unlynch xxxxx[/b] but my vote is still [b]#lynch anax[/b]

Ah what the heck. [b]#lynchAnax[/b] Might as well be a cool kid and jump on the bandwagon

Day 1 is over……results to come soon

Bandwagoning isn't cool, generally. The more people who bandwagon, the harder it is to notice alliances/mafia voting patterns. But following a lynch vote with clearly stated reasons, now [i]that[/i] is the essence of cool! :dealwithit:

sorry - i think i repeated what virt said (only he said it better) and i would love for chip's vote on anax to count but i think it was submitted after the deadline - it appears it would have changed nothing anyway. as a moderator, i hated when that happened - i knew their intent but had to stick to the deadline or upset others that would be affected

Correct, Chips vote was after the deadline and won’t count…

:roll:

Abs wrote: Posted: 4 minutes ago Post #159 Correct, Chips vote was after the deadline and won’t count… his previous vote will count as no lynch

It was a busy day in Narco Land….information is flowing, some honest, some fabricated. Alliances are being formed and games being played…. After the counting of the votes and taking into account individual voting power, the result is [b]#No Lynch[/b] It is now [b]Night 1[/b] please send to me your night actions if you so wish [b]AND all player abilities are now open to use….[/b] It’s going to be a long night, don’t walk down any dark streets, who knows what will be down there…. [b][size=16px]Good luck Narcos….[/size][/b] https://countingdownto.com/?c=4077391

[quote=ChipmunkWarrior]I can see the merits in the points of Hood and others, I too will change to [b]#NoVote[/b] I do not want simply kill someone blindly, but I won't just halt development.[/quote] This counts as no vote and is the same as not writing anything

[quote]Abs wrote: Posted: 4 minutes ago Post #159 Correct, Chips vote was after the deadline and won’t count… his previous vote will count as no lynch[/quote] correction to my above attempt at clarification - his previous vote of [b]no vote[/b] which we know that he intended as #abstain should take one vote away from the no lynch count

if we all knew the roles of all players - cartel members would have the 9 members of the opposing cartels as win clause [u]hard[/u] targets. the politician and the 2 DEA agents would be [u]soft[/u] targets as they are not part of the win clause. they would actually be non-targets since the kills they want would mostly help the cartels - DEA agents would have any 10 cartel members as [u]hard[/u] targets. and the politician only as a [u]soft[/u] target because he is trying to kill them. - the politician has the 4 cartel leaders and the 2 DEA agents as [u]hard[/u] targets and the other 8 non-leader cartel members as non-targets since that would only help the others get to their win clause sooner. no real new info here just a way to look at things when it comes time to kill. having your role and/or cartel affiliation known seems to be bad. that is why i am being very reluctant to share that info with anybody asking in PM.