dough_boy
God_of_War
dough_boy
COVID itself hasn't killed anyone, it just overwhelms the body and other things ultimately kill the person.
So they would have died w/o COVID of the same causes? Where are you going with this comment?
That COVID doesn't ACTUALLY kill. Everyone is scared of a virus that for the vast majority of people (98%+?) it doesn't cause problems.
Yes, you can say Cancer, HIV, allergies kill (or don't kill), but do you run around hiding from them? Hell, Flu can kill (lost a high school buddy), but does that stop people from living their lives? Fine, wear a mask and socially distance, but there is no reason to shut things down. California is the most restrictive (and has been) in the US (as far as chicken little), and yet it accounts for over 11% of the infections. Something tells me it isn't working.
How about we do California population at 98%... 80,000 deaths. Not too shabby.. except that isn't all of cali, that is only Los Angeles based on 4MM population. All of California would be 780,000 deaths at 98%. Of which, you are okay with?
How about we just make a law that says, if you test positive for Covid, we just go about 1940's Germany and instead of kill the weak and diseased, we just continue to let them die? Would that make it easier to deal with this? Maybe this comparison was too right'ish? I don't know anymore, you tell me what is acceptable.
[quote=dough_boy][quote=God_of_War][quote=dough_boy] COVID itself hasn't killed anyone, it just overwhelms the body and other things ultimately kill the person.[/quote]
So they would have died w/o COVID of the same causes? Where are you going with this comment? [/quote]
That COVID doesn't ACTUALLY kill. Everyone is scared of a virus that for the vast majority of people (98%+?) it doesn't cause problems.
Yes, you can say Cancer, HIV, allergies kill (or don't kill), but do you run around hiding from them? Hell, Flu can kill (lost a high school buddy), but does that stop people from living their lives? Fine, wear a mask and socially distance, but there is no reason to shut things down. California is the most restrictive (and has been) in the US (as far as chicken little), and yet it accounts for over 11% of the infections. Something tells me it isn't working.
[/quote]
How about we do California population at 98%... 80,000 deaths. Not too shabby.. except that isn't all of cali, that is only Los Angeles based on 4MM population. All of California would be 780,000 deaths at 98%. Of which, you are okay with?
How about we just make a law that says, if you test positive for Covid, we just go about 1940's Germany and instead of kill the weak and diseased, we just continue to let them die? Would that make it easier to deal with this? Maybe this comparison was too right'ish? I don't know anymore, you tell me what is acceptable.
Hi there!