The current 12 best players on the site
  • 1348 posts
  • Page 30 of 90
The_Bishop wrote:
I love this kind of wisdom! LOL :roll:
«God doesn't play dice with the World» ~ Albert Einstein
The_Bishop wrote:
So finally Stratix got it, according to Ultrix's prediction.
Well, congrats to the new Dominator Stratosphere!

Just, let me say the truth, there were only 3 players in that game. Please don't hate me if I say what I think.

Stratos, Maafi and Nikeboix in few rounds had twice the troops than the others. And that has nothing to do with the drop, sorry Spartakus. Plus after the Delija's suicidal opening and the failed kill on him the game was almost over. A ruined game I would say. I didn't see the ending really because I had already enough, it looked like a poor game.

The fact is that sametimers gain lot of points in their games and easy get on the top 12, but it's hard for them to understand how to play standard games, specially when the number of players is high. Maybe they are better at caps, surely they know how to play 1v1, but not multiplayer deathmatch, that is not for them.

Since I think we should change how the point system works relative to same-time games, or just going for a double rank as proposed by someone, but it looks a bit weird and complex to do really.

I hope nobody gets offended if I propose to limit a bit the sametimers' power. This is not for me, just for the site, because I had never seen a D12 final game so poor.

Apart from that still congrats Stratix!
«God doesn't play dice with the World» ~ Albert Einstein
UltrasPlot wrote:
Let me just say that sametimers struggle greatly when click war is not involved... you know who you are.

Proposing that to play in the D12 game you must have completed 20 Consecutive and 4+ player games within the last month.
BETA wrote:
#1. who has time to play and finish TWENTY cons. turn, 4+ player games in one month?

#2. Do you have any idea how how much more inactive some of the top dominators are once they make that list. (for fear of dropping?)
 
So, the counter offer :) -
make two dominator games. one same time. one cons. which allows all the top 12 to join. Then the winners square off in a cons. turn battle.
Matty wrote:
Except that "the winners fight eachother" will result in a 2p game.

But yes, a seperate dominator game for consecutive and same time might be nescessary yes.
"Strength doesn't lie in numbers, strength doesn't lie in wealth. Strength lies in nights of peaceful slumbers." ~Maria
BETA wrote:
I dont see the harm in a square off between just two players. (Till you explain it to me, haha.)

We can also have team dominator games, with the winners squaring off in a free for all. So the final dominator game can be a 3 player or a four player.