• 357 posts
  • Page 12 of 24
KeetchBeast wrote:
2ofclubs

you were gung ho against hood earlier, but now against KC. Did something change, do you have info about either??
Ginger King
KC321 wrote:
KeetchBeast
2ofclubs

you were gung ho against hood earlier, but now against KC. Did something change, do you have info about either??

Usually Mafia just wants anyone that isn't mafia dead. He's just planting seeds and hoping one sprouts. He knows I'm not mafia, and I also have a feeling that Hood also isn't.

The way he knows this is Mafia is in a chat, and I/we are not in it. 
2ofclubs wrote:
KC321
KeetchBeast
2ofclubs

you were gung ho against hood earlier, but now against KC. Did something change, do you have info about either??

Usually Mafia just wants anyone that isn't mafia dead. He's just planting seeds and hoping one sprouts. He knows I'm not mafia, and I also have a feeling that Hood also isn't.

The way he knows this is Mafia is in a chat, and I/we are not in it. 
I was not gun ho on either. The town chats I created and invited to didn't provide a mafia. Both were yellow flag voting day 1. Kc has proved innocents and actually smells more. I didn't create the bandwagon on kc.
I gave up my PM and so far can only be guilty of friendly fire on Kc.
Town can vote in away to save him and mafia can to. Those who vote to save him will bring focus on them selves.
In any case Ten will give us real verified info at days end. Town and mafia both know I am town. For kc to say I am mafia in a mafia chat is a hail Mary or poor song and dance.
Newbies there will be a vote sing at days end. I personally don't put a lot on vote behavior early but in this game it seems to have weight.
WRKD4IT
2ofclubs wrote:
We cant prove who is in what chat. But those in my chats and with my post can see i am upfront a fully disclosed on who I am, intent and for town.
Mafia doesnt like that they don't have an ability to target. So it will be me as level headed town uniter.
WRKD4IT
KC321 wrote:
Throwing an idea out there.... I personally wouldn't want to get rid of me, hood, or 2oC. Were literally the only ones making the game progress. I would suggest that we vote out those players that are not accounted for. They are not providing any value to the game, and they could be hindering progress should they have an crucial role. This would be the case no matter if they are mafia (likely hitman) or town (likely Sherriff). If we get rid of those crucial roles, TLM will have to re-distribute them to keep the game going. With all of this being said. I am voting in Have. Why, because he is at the bottom of the list. If have chimes in, I'll just go up the list to the next inactive player.

**edit spelling

Vote Have

2ofclubs
Updated.
here is the current vote tally thru post # 144 161 w 10 5 hrs Until deadline = lots of time
total of 5 6 votes cast

kc - 4 3 - vicious, 2oc, gerf, kc
goryh - 3 - hood, and 2 for not voting
NO - 2 - KC, Jethro

kbeast - 3 - did not vote (2) nor post a comment (1)
train - 3 - did not vote (2) nor post a comment (1)
abs - 3 - did not vote (2) nor post a comment (1)
k8 - 3 - did not vote (2) nor post a comment (1)
stobbs - 3 - did not vote (2) nor post a comment (1)
great - 3 - did not vote (2) nor post a comment (1)
wise - 3 - did not vote (2) nor post a comment (1)
mike - 3 - did not vote (2) nor post a comment (1)
yoda - 3 - did not vote (2) nor post a comment (1)
tm - 3 - did not vote (2) nor post a comment (1)
have - 3 - did not vote (2) nor post a comment (1)

ajs - 2 - did not vote (2)
jethro - 2 - did not vote (2)
bowhog - 2 - did not vote (2)
rock - 2 - did not vote (2)

2oc - 0
gerf - 0
hood - 0
vicious - 0
2ofclubs wrote:
Here is chat from the group Hood was in
Abs said:
10 Jun 2026, 11:37
Why is Hood raging on me so hard out the blocks?
Hoodlum said:
10 Jun 2026, 11:44
in my last mafia game, when it came down to a crunch between me and clubs and someone else. i forgot the scenario.. u were casually playing and not even paying attention u ruined the experience by voting to lync hood we were both town but you said the reason "because hood can't just come back after an absence and just win the game!"
u then disappeared without playing further, and lost the game for us all, handing a victory to clubs. if i were to play this time around, i wanna get those type of players out first. just survival tactic for me.
Hoodlum said:
10 Jun 2026, 11:45
anyway, just trying to get my understanding of the structure of this game. usually takes me a few days if i survive long enough. feels like we're missing some real basic stuff to keep things running. like, i a proper trade setup, maybe a butcher or a baker to actually get some order here. just a classic bbc kind of thing if you think about it.
Abs said:
10 Jun 2026, 11:49
Fair enough Hood, I’m fully involved in this one now and getting my bearings. I think it’s very ambitious from a set up perspective with so many new players so we have to deal with that. No doubt 50% will be silent or drop off

To me it seems there are still abilities and obvious classic roles but just a different narrative
Great_Kabuki said:
10 Jun 2026, 13:10
I have no interest in being silent but expect to make mistakes as I learn.

Rush Limbaugh - blast from the radio era past.

I'm CST also - need to coordinate this in my brain.
2ofclubs said:
10 Jun 2026, 16:22
I feel like I am moving up on the hit list. :(
Hoodlum said:
10 Jun 2026, 16:24
hope so
Hoodlum said:
10 Jun 2026, 16:24
:roll:
2ofclubs said:
10 Jun 2026, 17:03
Well that sounds smelly buddy. lol given my big claim as vanilla town. I know you play the smelly line and doesnt mean you are smelly.
2ofclubs said:
10 Jun 2026, 17:13
I think I am proteted but willing to take one for the town 
WRKD4IT
TerritorialMissings wrote:
I see I'm next up on that list incase Have posts in. I agree with your logic though KC
#Have
I will also remove my vote if he posts in.

KC321
Throwing an idea out there.... I personally wouldn't want to get rid of me, hood, or 2oC. Were literally the only ones making the game progress. I would suggest that we vote out those players that are not accounted for. They are not providing any value to the game, and they could be hindering progress should they have an crucial role. This would be the case no matter if they are mafia (likely hitman) or town (likely Sherriff). If we get rid of those crucial roles, TLM will have to re-distribute them to keep the game going. With all of this being said. I am voting in Have. Why, because he is at the bottom of the list. If have chimes in, I'll just go up the list to the next inactive player.

**edit spelling

Vote Have
stobbs24 wrote:
Newbie here but listening to 2oC talk he sounds very suspicious. 2oC has come out strong against hoodlum. Not sure about hood either lots of chatter has me thinking both are mafioso.

I vote 2oC today

2ofclubs wrote:
stobbs24
Newbie here but listening to 2oC talk he sounds very suspicious. 2oC has come out strong against hoodlum. Not sure about hood either lots of chatter has me thinking both are mafioso.

I vote 2oC today

Lol strong = as in revieling my full moderator PM that matches everything i said and have done for and as town.
day ended in 30 min.
WRKD4IT
ajsbus wrote:
ajsbus
#train
Boot and inactive

*boot an inactive
Switch to have so we get some votes on someone at least

lynch Have
ajsbus is online.
KeetchBeast wrote:
It seems like we just don't have to go off of as of now. Though I suppose a successful lynching would help us start identifying.

Anyone want to be in some conversations tonight?

We don't know why no one died last night, right?
Ginger King
goryh wrote:
Sorry, don't have time to catch up on everything before I vote. But voting off inactive seems like a good idea.
#Have

Due to my time zone, the deadline to vote is very inconvenient and I miss half of the days discussion. Am I allowed to cast a conditional vote before I go to bed at night in case I don't get back in the morning in time to cast a real vote?