War of Moving Cities Game Thread

[quote=Hoodlum]bored. how bout u catch us all up clubs..with your list. i know u got one. [/quote] I said I lost my said I lost my spread sheet. Winging it but I will try. It's Ground Hog Day... Winter ended but S3 hasn't started..?.. Peri's wifi is so spotty. Apparently some players partners have manipulation abities and they are unlynchable. Anax has been assimilated by Lando. Hood is inocent,, you need his vote, he doesn't need saved, and is winning. Ten told me Mada told him to tell me to sub as host (just PM me your other PMs ). Lastly, apparently stalkers aren't bad mafia. Their owners are.. "Guns don't kill - Players owning guns kill" Ps. All kill abilities are suspended this phase for peace talks in Manchester "can you dig it" don't be a "warrior come out an play yaa".

All valid points and concerns. I am curious as well on the assassin point. I believe there have been open bids for assassins haven't there? if that's the case then it's probably a single player who gets hired out to kill and not like the slaves or stalkers who are auctioned off in multiple sets. I don't know. this one is so siloed and individual that it makes it hard to determine if working with your own faction will actually help you in the end. I am just reiterating what you said, trying to reason it all out as well. I think you covered it all. I do think you may be right about the neutrals being the mafia in this one. They seem to be the most dangerous, although the peace lovers are too but we have seemingly caught onto their game and been good about avoiding their win clause so far. We need to take out more neutrals, even the playing field a bit more. We have several people who have been utterly quiet in the forum, I don't know how active they've been in side chats. I have talked to several people who have questions about Blue and don't know much about him, same with Anax but who knows? Mada has cooked up a good one here.

From post 497 "We need to take out more" is not Peace talk. You are warned "Silence - I KILL YOU" :P

All valid and great points from manipulating GREEN/TRACTION/PEACE/NEUTRAL players. I think we are in a good spot for know who to lynch the next phase.

[quote=2ofclubs]From post 497 "We need to take out more" is not Peace talk. You are warned "Silence - I KILL YOU" :P [/quote] I never said I was for peace.

[quote=ThickTalon]All valid and great points from manipulating GREEN/TRACTION/PEACE/NEUTRAL players. I think we are in a good spot for know who to lynch the next phase. [/quote] We are? Who do you suggest?

[quote=Rockbert]All valid points and concerns. I am curious as well on the assassin point. I believe there have been open bids for assassins haven't there? if that's the case then it's probably a single player who gets hired out to kill and not like the slaves or stalkers who are auctioned off in multiple sets. I don't know. this one is so siloed and individual that it makes it hard to determine if working with your own faction will actually help you in the end. I am just reiterating what you said, trying to reason it all out as well. I think you covered it all. I do think you may be right about the neutrals being the mafia in this one. They seem to be the most dangerous, although the peace lovers are too but we have seemingly caught onto their game and been good about avoiding their win clause so far. We need to take out more neutrals, even the playing field a bit more. We have several people who have been utterly quiet in the forum, I don't know how active they've been in side chats. I have talked to several people who have questions about Blue and don't know much about him, same with Anax but who knows? Mada has cooked up a good one here. [/quote] I also agree....I think neutrals are our biggest threat....because if all the traction and green are eliminated (or close to being eliminated)....then the neutrals don't have to lynch anyone to get peace....or they have more players to organize their votes to get peace from a tie.

Perhaps we could weed out the neutrals and have just traction and greens left.

I'm currently at a cottage ...spotty wifi depending if im in the cottage or at the beach.....so ill be here in spurts.

Neither have I. I am mudding the waters. If we look at characters list there are only 2 factions , 3 win cluase and 4 roles. Roles can be changed by death/resurrection or masters. I.e I am and claimed of the traditional big 2 against each other but one can assume/conclude I have a master forcing me to appear or act peaceful. Or or or or..... All we know is ABS is undead 2x, Jkl Green and Ryo Trac are now undead along with what their abilities Were. Everything else is foggy / questionable!

There is the issue that the UNdead grow with every kill and lynch. Some call that a pickle.

so vote off lolf unless somebody has a better suggestion - don't wait til the deadline - you can always change later if you need to. also don't think that just because we have 4 votes on lolf that he will die = we need more than 3-4 voters or we could have 3 peacelovers voting for him that will switch last minute to make the tie

[b][size=16px]#Lynch Lolfattenski[/size][/b] Hmmm so inactive will be Undead inactive.

Here I am. Watching like I do. I’ve talked to some people. Ask me somethin, maybe I’ll answer. Rock I’m not going to quote all your stuff because you have said a lot. Which seems to be out of character for you unless you are in somebody’s pocket feel real safe. I’ve told enough people that it’s probably no secret by now that I do have the peace clause. Sucks to be me, but I find it fascinating that you keep driving this point of no peace over and over and over. And I get it if you don’t have that win clause you don’t want it to happen. But what win clause do you have? Cause you don’t seem to be working on the other 2 win clauses of elimination of the other faction, cause all you say is find the peace mongers (and now that others have brought it up) find the neutrals. But the more I look at it I think you are a neutral or have win clauses that thrive on the war. That’s why you want peace dead because you don’t need to win the war you just need it to keep going so you can profit on it (win). So there now you can’t pull that inactive crap on me.

Wow. Hey Blue, good to hear from you. Being active in the forum is actually not at all out of character for me. Not even close. I am not neutral, I have a faction and one of my three clauses is to eliminate the opposite faction. Pure and simple. I also have always said that neutrals AND peace were the preferred targets because they are both dangerous. That is nothing new and you can verify by going through the posts if you wish. Also, I said you were quiet, I didn't say you were inactive, I mentioned you because you'd been quiet in the forum and those I have spoken to, (which is not everyone) have said they didn't know anything about you so I assumed you were in a small group of chats or just being quiet. Inactive is definitely Lolf. I think he has given up and as such I voted to [b]#Lynch Lolfattenski[/b] unless something else comes up to change my mind for a different vote. I do not thrive on the war, but I don't want peace either, I want to eliminate the other faction.