Officla thread for the Mafia Narcos Game
  • 652 posts
  • Page 16 of 44
pygmyhippo277 wrote:
I think it would be wise to get tenn out of here, I agree with ryo's reasoning.

#Lynch TLM
Eat my dust.
orzhovboss wrote:
Rockbert
orzhovboss
And v98 I know for a fact that quite a few people did join.

Orz, do you have any evidence of this? That statement makes it seem like you would have the eavesdropper ability. I might not have shared that if I were you. May have made yourself a target. You're a smart player though, so I wonder what is beneath that ploy. I am not accusing you of anything, I just find it very interesting that you would highlight yourself this way.


I wouldn't be so sure I'm a 'smart player' I'm also the 2nd least experienced. I probably messed up by sharing that.
If I was eavesdropper then my ability is used, why would anyone kill me?
everyone needs to know what a potential threat the voting bloc is though
I am not directly opposed to it. But it could be very powerful. I haven't joined and as such don't know much about it. But I am still worried about it's strength.
2ofclubs wrote:
Don't let the bloc rabbit hole distract you from those in actives but online at the same time players!¿!
WRKD4IT
2ofclubs is online.
orzhovboss wrote:
2ofclubs
Don't let the bloc rabbit hole distract you from those in actives but online at the same time players!¿!

too lazy to look at profiles
who are these players?
Rockbert wrote:
orzhovboss
Rockbert
orzhovboss
And v98 I know for a fact that quite a few people did join.

Orz, do you have any evidence of this? That statement makes it seem like you would have the eavesdropper ability. I might not have shared that if I were you. May have made yourself a target. You're a smart player though, so I wonder what is beneath that ploy. I am not accusing you of anything, I just find it very interesting that you would highlight yourself this way.


I wouldn't be so sure I'm a 'smart player' I'm also the 2nd least experienced. I probably messed up by sharing that.
If I was eavesdropper then my ability is used, why would anyone kill me?
everyone needs to know what a potential threat the voting bloc is though
I am not directly opposed to it. But it could be very powerful. I haven't joined and as such don't know much about it. But I am still worried about it's strength.

Either you used it or you made a bold statement to imply using it, but if you have eavesdropper, then that smacks squarely of DEA. Therefore, I am saying #Lynch Orzhovboss.
"A writer is a person for whom writing is more difficult than it is for other people."
- Thomas Mann
Rockbert is online.
jkl3699 wrote:
#Lynch Orz

I agree with Rock's reasoning. Orz has to either have eavesdropper or know someone with eavesdropper to have access to that information. The only person who would have shared that with him is a fellow DEA.
2ofclubs wrote:
orzhovboss
2ofclubs
Don't let the bloc rabbit hole distract you from those in actives but online at the same time players!¿!

too lazy to look at profiles
who are these players?

Come on it was posted 2x and Rock commented to its oddity.

Follow along, I can't do all your smuggling ;)
WRKD4IT
2ofclubs is online.
orzhovboss wrote:
jkl3699
#Lynch Orz

I agree with Rock's reasoning. Orz has to either have eavesdropper or know someone with eavesdropper to have access to that information. The only person who would have shared that with him is a fellow DEA.

I can do one better - I know someone in the voting bloc. I am simply bringing this to light for everyone to see.
orzhovboss wrote:
I'm not dea, or eavesdropper. I am simply someone who was given access to information that he thought should be publicized. A whistleblower if you will.
jkl3699 wrote:
orzhovboss
jkl3699
#Lynch Orz

I agree with Rock's reasoning. Orz has to either have eavesdropper or know someone with eavesdropper to have access to that information. The only person who would have shared that with him is a fellow DEA.

I can do one better - I know someone in the voting bloc. I am simply bringing this to light for everyone to see.

Who do you know in the voting bloc?
ChipmunkWarrior wrote:
Okay, wow.

So we know multiple people in the voting block now. AND we know orz is up to something nefarious where he may have eavesdropper.


I will say. IF orzhov had used eavesdropper, then him being an eavesdropper is not a threat as it's already been used up.

I think lynching orzhov isn't a bad idea, (i'm fairly sure we're not in the same cartel), but I'm going to hold my cards close to my chest and wait a while before I vote to lynch him. Probably a good idea to get him outta here though
"The tallest beanstalks sway in the wind the most

- Ancient South African Proverb
Ryomyr wrote:
Hoodlum
Virtuosity98
And now I see ryo also claimed a faction, not just doctor role.......... |) All these 'doctors', I'm sure that's more than 4 now??
there were 5 doctors. 1 player tried to be bold!

I am curious...who tried to make the bold play? 
...
orzhovboss wrote:
jkl3699
orzhovboss
jkl3699
#Lynch Orz

I agree with Rock's reasoning. Orz has to either have eavesdropper or know someone with eavesdropper to have access to that information. The only person who would have shared that with him is a fellow DEA.

I can do one better - I know someone in the voting bloc. I am simply bringing this to light for everyone to see.

Who do you know in the voting bloc?

I am open to sharing, But I need to check if it is ok w/ my source. Anyways I will PM you/others that want it to protect my source from the wrong people getting ahold of it.
jkl3699 wrote:
orzhovboss
jkl3699
orzhovboss
jkl3699
#Lynch Orz

I agree with Rock's reasoning. Orz has to either have eavesdropper or know someone with eavesdropper to have access to that information. The only person who would have shared that with him is a fellow DEA.

I can do one better - I know someone in the voting bloc. I am simply bringing this to light for everyone to see.

Who do you know in the voting bloc?

I am open to sharing, But I need to check if it is ok w/ my source. Anyways I will PM you/others that want it to protect my source from the wrong people getting ahold of it.

What if your source doesn't want to be exposed? It seems like the perfect excuse to me. Just reveal it in the public forum and let everybody make their own conclusions