Romeo & Juliet Mafia - Game Thread

Yes, true. But first things first, let's get the town to win, then we can fight out the Capulet / Montague battle.

[quote=Hoodlum]if montague wins, you lost. there's no victory. outnumber is the win. [/quote] Yup. We should lynch Alex first, then Mada and depending on how Mada turns out, we'll know about Mdhaglund. But again, I don't want a tie with this lynch so if that means Mada must die first, so be it. On a totally separate note, Hood you posted a while back in a post that said nothing but: [b]Romeo Must Die![/b] I assume you were talking about the movie? Great Movie!

yup jet li fan lol. but i thought i read that alex said he was romeo also, and thought that was fitting

[quote=Rockbert]Yes, true. But first things first, let's get the town to win, then we can fight out the Capulet / Montague battle. [/quote] yes. we get the shopkeeper now while we can with numbers, then we get the taxman who doesn't know when and who purchase illegal votes etc. alex sides with montague or capulet or mafia. not town

So to be clear? Hood+1, Ely, Mada and Anax want to lynch [s]hostile[/s] [s]neutral[/s] [s]Capulate[/s] [s]unafilliated[/s] shop-keep who has to much "power". That's lynching Plain Shop keep not caring on any alignment and give said power to the 3+ Richist Lord. [b]So Alex richness just transfers.[/b] Sorry I don't follow that logic. Excuse me Mada is voting on Alex to stay alive. I do agree somebody need to swing. Alex how many illegal votes were purchased today by color if possible.?

[quote=2ofclubs]So to be clear? Hood+1, Ely, Mada and Anax want to lynch [s]hostile[/s] [s]neutral[/s] [s]Capulate[/s] [s]unafilliated[/s] shop-keep who has to much "power". That's lynching Plain Shop keep not caring on any alignment and give said power to the 3+ Richist Lord. [b]So Alex richness just transfers.[/b] Sorry I don't follow that logic. Excuse me Mada is voting on Alex to stay alive. I do agree somebody need to swing. Alex how many illegal votes were purchased today by color if possible.?[/quote] 2ofC, Alex is an admitted Neutral and is not in our win clause and has had a chance to build his repository far too long. This should be more than enough reason. Then Mada is next as he is not of our House and in doing so, we will be able to determine whether or not we need to get rid of Md next.

[quote=elysium5][quote=2ofclubs]So to be clear? Hood+1, Ely, Mada and Anax want to lynch [s]hostile[/s] [s]neutral[/s] [s]Capulate[/s] [s]unafilliated[/s] shop-keep who has to much "power". That's lynching Plain Shop keep not caring on any alignment and give said power to the 3+ Richist Lord. [b]So Alex richness just transfers.[/b] Sorry I don't follow that logic. Excuse me Mada is voting on Alex to stay alive. I do agree somebody need to swing. Alex how many illegal votes were purchased today by color if possible.?[/quote] 2ofC, Alex is an admitted Neutral and [b]is not in our win clause[/b] and has had a chance to build his repository far too long. This should be more than enough reason. Then Mada is next as he is not of our House and in doing so, we will be able to determine whether or not we need to get rid of Md next.[/quote] I dont know what your win clause says, but mine says "all [b]hostile[/b] neutrals." Do we have proof that Alex is hostile? I do agree he has to go, but if you and I can trust each other, then we know for a fact Mada isn't part of either our win clauses while also not being town. Thats why its Mada for me.

[quote=elysium5][quote=2ofclubs]So to be clear? Hood+1, Ely, Mada and Anax want to lynch[b] [s]hostile[/s] [s]neutral[/s] [s]Capulate[/s] [s]unafilliated[/s] shop-keep[/b] who has to much "power". That's lynching Plain Shop keep not caring on any alignment and give said power to the 3+ Richist Lord. [b]So Alex richness just transfers.[/b] Sorry I don't follow that logic. Excuse me Mada is voting on Alex to stay alive. I do agree somebody need to swing. Alex how many illegal votes were purchased today by color if possible.?[/quote] 2ofC, Alex[b] is an admitted Neutral [/b]and is not in our win clause and has had a chance to build his repository far too long. This should be more than enough reason. Then Mada is next as he is not of our House and in doing so, we will be able to determine whether or not we need to get rid of Md next.[/quote] He hasn't admitted it. He was labeled. He has played with it and or the like i.e "well since I am neutral." Like I said their are 3 neutrals. One is dead. [b]Who would be the others?[/b] Shop keep + accountant, Shop keep + Romeo, Shop keep +Juliet, Shop keep + Nurse, Romeo+Juliet, Romeo and mistress nurse, Juliet + accountant, etc Hell, Rock has a fancy for Juliet in that case. Maybe its the 2 red avatars Ely and Hood

I am not fighting you cuz. Just wanting to aim straight.

anax knows all about the shopkeeper role. we, hood, anax, ely, madagascarter know how it went down. 1 player vs everyone. 1 winner. alex is siding with whoever? nah bro nah. :)

@ Hood+1 I follow you with that. What about the just transferring power part though?

[quote=Mdhaglund][quote=elysium5][quote=2ofclubs]So to be clear? Hood+1, Ely, Mada and Anax want to lynch [s]hostile[/s] [s]neutral[/s] [s]Capulate[/s] [s]unafilliated[/s] shop-keep who has to much "power". That's lynching Plain Shop keep not caring on any alignment and give said power to the 3+ Richist Lord. [b]So Alex richness just transfers.[/b] Sorry I don't follow that logic. Excuse me Mada is voting on Alex to stay alive. I do agree somebody need to swing. Alex how many illegal votes were purchased today by color if possible.?[/quote] 2ofC, Alex is an admitted Neutral and [b]is not in our win clause[/b] and has had a chance to build his repository far too long. This should be more than enough reason. Then Mada is next as he is not of our House and in doing so, we will be able to determine whether or not we need to get rid of Md next.[/quote] I dont know what your win clause says, but mine says "all [b]hostile[/b] neutrals." Do we have proof that Alex is hostile? I do agree he has to go, but if you and I can trust each other, then we know for a fact Mada isn't part of either our win clauses while also not being town. Thats why its Mada for me.[/quote] Yup, all hostile neutrals. And I agree that Mada needs to go before you but the shopkeeper should be first.

[quote=2ofclubs][quote=elysium5][quote=2ofclubs]So to be clear? Hood+1, Ely, Mada and Anax want to lynch[b] [s]hostile[/s] [s]neutral[/s] [s]Capulate[/s] [s]unafilliated[/s] shop-keep[/b] who has to much "power". That's lynching Plain Shop keep not caring on any alignment and give said power to the 3+ Richist Lord. [b]So Alex richness just transfers.[/b] Sorry I don't follow that logic. Excuse me Mada is voting on Alex to stay alive. I do agree somebody need to swing. Alex how many illegal votes were purchased today by color if possible.?[/quote] 2ofC, Alex[b] is an admitted Neutral [/b]and is not in our win clause and has had a chance to build his repository far too long. This should be more than enough reason. Then Mada is next as he is not of our House and in doing so, we will be able to determine whether or not we need to get rid of Md next.[/quote] He hasn't admitted it. He was labeled. He has played with it and or the like i.e "well since I am neutral." Like I said their are 3 neutrals. One is dead. [b]Who would be the others?[/b] Shop keep + accountant, Shop keep + Romeo, Shop keep +Juliet, Shop keep + Nurse, Romeo+Juliet, Romeo and mistress nurse, Juliet + accountant, etc Hell, Rock has a fancy for Juliet in that case. Maybe its the 2 red avatars Ely and Hood [/quote] Yes, he has admitted it. He was labelled and then caved to the pressure and admitted it but claims to not be a threat to anyone. He says he can win with anyone and admittedly he hasn't done anything that we know of to hurt town but he really hasn't helped much either. That in itself says he has his own interests at heart and not anyone else's really. If he really wants to align himself with Town, he could have offered up some info that he must know would out potential Mafia targets so I don't trust him at all. I don't know if he is Hostile or not but a neutral is a neutral and getting rid of them means we don't have to worry any more about hiding hostiles, plus he is neutral and has had the shop WAY too long as such.

[quote=2ofclubs]I am not fighting you cuz. Just wanting to aim straight.[/quote] I know. I'm just trying to show you my train of thought.

[quote=elysium5][quote=Mdhaglund][quote=elysium5][quote=2ofclubs]So to be clear? Hood+1, Ely, Mada and Anax want to lynch [s]hostile[/s] [s]neutral[/s] [s]Capulate[/s] [s]unafilliated[/s] shop-keep who has to much "power". That's lynching Plain Shop keep not caring on any alignment and give said power to the 3+ Richist Lord. [b]So Alex richness just transfers.[/b] Sorry I don't follow that logic. Excuse me Mada is voting on Alex to stay alive. I do agree somebody need to swing. Alex how many illegal votes were purchased today by color if possible.?[/quote] 2ofC, Alex is an admitted Neutral and [b]is not in our win clause[/b] and has had a chance to build his repository far too long. This should be more than enough reason. Then Mada is next as he is not of our House and in doing so, we will be able to determine whether or not we need to get rid of Md next.[/quote] I dont know what your win clause says, but mine says "all [b]hostile[/b] neutrals." Do we have proof that Alex is hostile? I do agree he has to go, but if you and I can trust each other, then we know for a fact Mada isn't part of either our win clauses while also not being town. Thats why its Mada for me.[/quote] Yup, [b]all hostile neutrals. And I agree[/b] that Mada needs to go before you but the shopkeeper should be first.[/quote] What are you in a private chat with them? Like the mafia has theirs. So its 1) Alex 2) Mada 3) MDH " the flaw is all hostile neutrals. And I agree" Alex agrees Alex needs go 1st. REALLY!