There are plenty of places where rivers and bridges can be eliminated really. I think if one loves 'A Song of Ice and Fire' can play Westeros & Essos map, more accurate and excellent in graphic. If one loves big size maps we have Texas and World Expanded which are better in my opinion. I believe this one has no future, every day less popular (if you check my stats it's falling down from 2 games per day to 1 per day recently). Capital placements are horrible and nobody never checked my proposals. Not to mention the issue of the invisible cap' in the white region, never fixed... It may be turned 'discontinued' for me, like it was for the old USA map and the old South Africa District.
@Hood, I liked the Chicago map! The second proposal is also cool, I cannot decide really, less scrolly but also less room for labels, beatiful look but completely different style from previous. You cutted the river again though! I think it should be visible also in the non-playing area. As for the gameplay, I noticed you described something similar to what I told about large region maps: well, you call it "continenters" and "roamers", I say "lions" and "vultures", but it's the same thing. As for the game rules you described, I believe the manual deployement makes the game trivial, and the 6 cards rule is catastrophically stalemating!
There are plenty of places where rivers and bridges can be eliminated really. I think if one loves [i]'A Song of Ice and Fire'[/i] can play [u]Westeros & Essos[/u] map, more accurate and excellent in graphic. If one loves big size maps we have [u]Texas[/u] and [u]World Expanded[/u] which are better in my opinion. I believe this one has no future, every day less popular (if you check my stats it's falling down from 2 games per day to 1 per day recently). Capital placements are horrible and nobody never checked my proposals. Not to mention the issue of the invisible cap' in the white region, never fixed... It may be turned 'discontinued' for me, like it was for the old USA map and the old South Africa District.
@Hood, I liked the Chicago map! The second proposal is also cool, I cannot decide really, less scrolly but also less room for labels, beatiful look but completely different style from previous. You cutted the river again though! I think it should be visible also in the non-playing area. As for the gameplay, I noticed you described something similar to what I told about large region maps: well, you call it "continenters" and "roamers", I say "lions" and "vultures", but it's the same thing. As for the game rules you described, I believe the manual deployement makes the game trivial, and the 6 cards rule is catastrophically stalemating!
«God doesn't play dice with the World» ~ Albert Einstein