The Witch's Coven Gameplay Thread

[spoiler]There it is. Third public clean card. Your board is now: #1 — NOT A WITCH #2 — NOT A WITCH #3 — NOT A WITCH #4 — hidden #5 — hidden Marks — 0/7 Stocks — until 8:30 server time This is actually a nice outcome for you. Npat, Clubs and Tenn have spent a huge amount of Day 3 ammunition putting you through two trials, and both came back clean. Now do absolutely nothing

[quote=2ofclubs][quote=notoriouspat][quote=Hoodlum][spoiler=looks like GPT having more fun than me lol]For now: DON'T DO ANYTHING Let Tenn select the card. Let ajsbus flip it. When it inevitably comes back: NOT A WITCH don't immediately celebrate or attack anybody. I want to see their first reactions to Hoodlum producing yet another clean Tryal. Especially: Npat — does he still say “hit Hood again”? Tenn — does he finally reconsider? Clubs — does he keep pushing you? Goryh — does he challenge the strategy? Those reactions may be considerably more informative than the Trial itself. Paste the next page when it moves. This Day is getting good. [/quote] Thats hilarious! [/quote] Lol likely edited. According to history and play style. Artificial Ignorance. By the way I am not pushing you, you brought it on by the last minute Jacob card move.[/quote] well, GPT brought it on lol

Don't reconsider Ten. Hood forged or as NPat said told it to have certain defaults.

Folks, either way, Im out of this game with this Cat. I don't think we can win unless we flip at least one witch. I still say we stick with the plan on Hood but I can't play any more accusations. idk how else we win? Spreading them out amongst us all is not working either. There is still a 40% that if Hood was a witch, it was one of those two remaining cards. I have to go to bed now, but I can't wait to see what happens!

is anybody else using it? how would it advise against itself? if for instance i fed all the info into it, and we were both not witches - would it/could it give different advice?

[quote=Hoodlum][spoiler][/quote] What you moved cards not marks.

alright goryh - play all 3 accu + 1 evidence on hood and i will finish it

or somebody else how do the rest of you feel about this plan - vic, akk, jacob, cwolf?

[quote=Tennesseelogman]is anybody else using it? how would it advise against itself? if for instance i fed all the info into it, and we were both not witches - would it/could it give different advice?[/quote] One can get it to say what ever they want. All you have to is say rewright such and such as non witch. Or just ad the word NOT in front of witch. I use ChatGP a lot. It can also be wrong. I proved it and its response was great investigation. Then it added it to its data base. Its pulling from a data base of garbage in and garbage out.

those 4 were last on 6 hrs ago, 8 hrs ago, 1 day ago, and 2 days ago. that kinda gives a pass to vic and jacob if all witches must agree to the target and have not been on and an attempt was made. or was it? if not that makes them sus.

Finish the hood card turns.!!!! If you want you can then turn mine or Npat being at the same low point of hidden cards. ♧♧ 100% Town Not witch 2oC As far as those on last game. I claimed town out of the gate and was town. Same as the game before. In last game was Hood who claimed? NOooooo!

[i]This is not me asking. [/i] clubs, why do my last 2 have to be finished BEFORE we test you or pat? you both have 2 hidden too.

btw. GPT finds clubs and pat very very sus!

[quote=Tennesseelogman]those 4 were last on 6 hrs ago, 8 hrs ago, 1 day ago, and 2 days ago. that kinda gives a pass to vic and jacob if all witches must agree to the target and have not been on and an attempt was made. or was it? if not that makes them sus.[/quote] The morning report said no one died, save went unused, and as I read it no attempt of a kill. You know my suspect list. If 3 or more witches it still only takes 1 to be in agreement or no show removing kill ability. Maybe jacob is 3rd witch. Chose to no show and hood used him to take card out of play. ??

[quote=Hoodlum]btw. GPT finds clubs and pat very very sus! [/quote] BS