@Matty & @Vexer,
Yes I am fully aware that the colours around other colours change how we perceive the colours, but did you not see the facts I put in my post.
I copied each image into Photoshop and they are two different colours on the same pixel positions.
I can only assume that they have altered the picture colours to show what you could be seeing & should be seeing, but then how are we still getting people saying that "I see this colour or that colour"
Is nobody getting this?
I can only tell you that if you gave me the original image (untouched) and said what do you see here, I would simply zoom in to the pixels and select one and read the RGB numbers, which will tell me exactly what colour & tone it is! Then you could ask what people see and compare it. But to show another image with different colours on the RGB and ask "what colours do you see here" and then say, well it's actually these colours by putting another more vibrant image on, which when zoomed in and colour selected, shows a different RGB for the same pixels, is somewhat a ridiculous example and quite frankly very confusing, to those who can test this, as to why they would show manipulated colours to prove their point.
RGB numbers don't lie people!
The example Matty showed is the correct way to show this true colour perception.
The one on the right in my link is definitely blue (RGB 54, 68, 190) and a dark grey (blackish) with a tilt toward the Orange/Gold spectrum due to her skin colour behind (RGB 24 15 18) at one of its darkest points.
The one on the left is not the same picture colours, because zoomed in to the same pixels and colour selected, they are different on the RGB... See Post #2.
@Matty & @Vexer,
Yes I am fully aware that the colours around other colours change how we perceive the colours, but did you not see the facts I put in my post.
I copied each image into Photoshop and they are two different colours on the same pixel positions.
I can only assume that they have altered the picture colours to show what you could be seeing & should be seeing, but then how are we still getting people saying that "I see this colour or that colour"
Is nobody getting this?
I can only tell you that if you gave me the original image (untouched) and said what do you see here, I would simply zoom in to the pixels and select one and read the RGB numbers, which will tell me exactly what colour & tone it is! Then you could ask what people see and compare it. But to show another image with different colours on the RGB and ask "what colours do you see here" and then say, well it's actually these colours by putting another more vibrant image on, which when zoomed in and colour selected, shows a different RGB for the same pixels, is somewhat a ridiculous example and quite frankly very confusing, to those who can test this, as to why they would show manipulated colours to prove their point.
RGB numbers don't lie people!
The example Matty showed is the correct way to show this true colour perception.
The one on the right in my link is definitely blue (RGB 54, 68, 190) and a dark grey (blackish) with a tilt toward the Orange/Gold spectrum due to her skin colour behind (RGB 24 15 18) at one of its darkest points.
The one on the left is not the same picture colours, because zoomed in to the same pixels and colour selected, they are different on the RGB... See Post #2.
Hyd yn oed er fy mod Cymraeg , dim ond yn siarad Saesneg, felly yr wyf yn gobeithio y bydd y cyfieithu yn gywir.