@
Cireon I appreciate your contributions to the discussion. Some of the information I had seen before but I do appreciate your adding value, prior to your calling for self-censorship.
The most blatant issue, that has been a perpetual "Red Flag" to me, with this alleged pandemic is that the scale and tactics of the response are orders of magnitude more destructive than the threat itself and tend very clearly to the erosion of individual choices and Liberty on the road to hyper-Orwellian Technocratic Totalitarianism.
[SEE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6XInmwonpxc <- "Video done by Dana Ashlie. Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development" which looks at this]"The greatest tyrannies are always perpetrated in the name of the noblest causes." - Thomas Paine
To illustrate the very limited risk of the "virus":
Notice in your
BioNTech/Pfizer resource that in the "placebo" group of 21728 there were only 162 "cases", which would seem to show a very low risk of becoming a case, overall (0.75%), and if you take that minimal risk and factor in the reported (
though admittedly inflated) "case" to death rate, the risk of death to the general public is minuscule. For this, the world economic system is being destroyed, children are being subjected to trauma, bodily sovereignty is being violated under the guise of "public health", all thanks largely to the relentless fear-mongering propaganda and vehement censorship of any dissenting voice across most media.
[SEE: https://www.corbettreport.com/lockdowns/ & “Is This Torture?” by Amazing Polly https://www.bitchute.com/video/3yk3xezML8Q/]For example: assuming the above-mentioned odds of becoming a "case" of 0.75% and taking the relatively high "case fatality" rate of Peru of 9.4%
[SEE: https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/data/mortality], then the
risk of death attributed to "Covid-19" is 7 in 10,000.(
Looking at WHO numbers, the case to fatality rate is approximately 2.15% globally.) To put this into perspective, the
odds of dying in an automobile accident in the United States are 1 in 107.
If the response to this much more likely risk of death were treated in similar fashion to Covid-19, automobiles would be outlawed and any discussion of motorized vehicles would be highly censored.
[SEE ALSO: "UCLA, Stanford study finds for average 50-64 year old, chances of dying from COVID-19 are 1 in 19.1M" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FDDkY9z908M]The claim in the vaccine links you provided of "efficacy" in reducing symptoms and possibly limiting the likelihood of becoming a "case" are disingenuous, at best, given that the overwhelming majority of "cases" have little or no symptoms anyway. Also, this compares based on the idea that a group might get "infected" and then have lesser symptoms, which doesn't factor in that the vast majority of people will not become a case (SEE ABOVE). Whereas the "vaccine" has inherent risks, some of which are catastrophic, which every recipient must assume.
I have read many papers, articles, opinions and watched various commentaries, by experts and lay-people alike, from several angles of this issue. What I have posted, generally, aligns with the personal theory, thus far, I have formulated based on this research. While I may or may not agree with every point of every resource, those I post contain what appear to be logical reasoning and/or offer food for thought that has largely been ignored, suppressed and vilified from most media, to the general peril of ALL Humanity. Certainly alternative treatments, no matter how safe and effective, are largely discounted, if not outright suppressed.
[SEE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tn_b4NRTB6k <- "COVID, Ivermectin, and the Crime of the Century: DarkHorse Podcast with Pierre Kory & Bret Weinstein" & https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/treatments/hydroxychloroquine/treatment-protocols/ <- "Treatment Protocols" ] This suppression is directly due to the fact the experimental gene-therapies being heavily promoted worldwide are typically done under Emergency Use Authorizations (EUA) such as the one
issued by the FDA in the States, that is based on the assumption that no effective treatments exist, so to investigate or allow discussion of alternatives to the jabs would negate the justification for the EUA and should end the rollout (though, given the billions of dollars in profit the jabs
guarantee their makers, it is unlikely even the admission of effective treatments would stop the experiment).
"When we give government the power to make medical decisions for us, we in essence accept that the state owns our bodies.” – Former Senator, Dr. Ron Paul
I was told that this was the place for the discussion, now you're saying I shouldn't post links here??? I have refrained, as "requested", from posting links in "Live Chat" and have typically posted the link to this forum thread and had any ensuing related discussions in chat of games, in which I was participating, @Cireon, I read/viewed the resources you linked (and some linked from them, of course) but I would venture a guess you haven't investigated any I have posted.
Try these:
“Statement On Virus Isolation” by Dr. Kaufman et al https://www.andrewkaufmanmd.com/sovi/
"Dr. Roger Hodkinson on how governments responded to COVID" https://www.bitchute.com/video/zmqyDHO0At8g/ (this is mentioned therein)
“The Creation of a False Pandemic” by Jon Rappoport https://www.bitchute.com/video/Mt3oJ02N7l5z/
""Proof the Covid-19 `Vaccine’ Programme Should be Stopped Now" by Dr. Vernon Coleman" https://www.vernoncoleman.com/shouldbestopped.htm
"The Anatomy of Covid-19 by Dr. Andrew Kaufman" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GWRbIIaPV78
"Doctors Around the World Issue Dire WARNING: DO NOT GET THE COVID VACCINE!!" https://www.bitchute.com/video/jrXKyaJP7Eq0/
"Dr Andrew Kaufman - COVID19 - London Real Interview 29APR20" https://www.bitchute.com/video/EK33HYPhRC5w/“If you were to say, ‘If they could find this virus in you at all [you’re a “case”]…’ With PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody. It starts to make you believe in the sort of Buddhist notion that everything is contained in everything else…It doesn’t tell you that you’re sick, and it doesn’t tell you that the thing you ended up with, really, was going to hurt you or anything like that.”
- Dr. Kary Mullis, Nobel-Prize-winning inventor of the PCR test (currently the so-called “Gold Standard” test for the “virus”) https://www.bitchute.com/video/bR5HF0hNzZvI/
@[user]Cireon[/user] I appreciate your contributions to the discussion. Some of the information I had seen before but I do appreciate your adding value, prior to your calling for self-censorship.
The most blatant issue, that has been a perpetual "Red Flag" to me, with this alleged pandemic is that the scale and tactics of the response are orders of magnitude more destructive than the threat itself and tend very clearly to the erosion of individual choices and Liberty on the road to hyper-Orwellian Technocratic Totalitarianism.[size=11px][SEE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6XInmwonpxc <- "Video done by Dana Ashlie. Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development" which looks at [url=https://archive.org/details/rockefeller-foundation_202005]this[/url]][/size]
[quote]"The greatest tyrannies are always perpetrated in the name of the noblest causes." [b]- Thomas Paine[/b][/quote]
To illustrate the very limited risk of the "virus":
Notice in your [url=https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2034577]BioNTech/Pfizer[/url] resource that in the "placebo" group of 21728 there were only 162 "cases", which would seem to show a very low risk of becoming a case, overall (0.75%), and if you take that minimal risk and factor in the reported ([size=9px]though [url=https://www.bitchute.com/video/L5TdFkVzZUc/]admittedly inflated[/url][/size]) "case" to death rate, the risk of death to the general public is minuscule. For this, the world economic system is being destroyed, children are being subjected to trauma, bodily sovereignty is being violated under the guise of "public health", all thanks largely to the relentless fear-mongering propaganda and vehement censorship of any dissenting voice across most media. [size=11px][SEE: https://www.corbettreport.com/lockdowns/ & “Is This Torture?” by Amazing Polly https://www.bitchute.com/video/3yk3xezML8Q/][/size]
For example: assuming the above-mentioned odds of becoming a "case" of 0.75% and taking the relatively high "case fatality" rate of Peru of 9.4% [size=11px][SEE: https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/data/mortality][/size], then the [b]risk of death attributed to "Covid-19" is 7 in 10,000[/b].([size=11px]Looking at [url=https://covid19.who.int/]WHO[/url] numbers, the case to fatality rate is approximately 2.15% globally.[/size]) To put this into perspective, the [b]odds of dying in an automobile accident in the United States are 1 in 107[/b].
If the response to this much more likely risk of death were treated in similar fashion to Covid-19, automobiles would be outlawed and any discussion of motorized vehicles would be highly censored.[size=11px][SEE ALSO: "UCLA, Stanford study finds for average 50-64 year old, chances of dying from COVID-19 are 1 in 19.1M" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FDDkY9z908M][/size]
The claim in the vaccine links you provided of "efficacy" in reducing symptoms and possibly limiting the likelihood of becoming a "case" are disingenuous, at best, given that the overwhelming majority of "cases" have little or no symptoms anyway. Also, this compares based on the idea that a group might get "infected" and then have lesser symptoms, which doesn't factor in that the vast majority of people will not become a case (SEE ABOVE). Whereas the "vaccine" has inherent risks, some of which are catastrophic, which every recipient must assume.
I have read many papers, articles, opinions and watched various commentaries, by experts and lay-people alike, from several angles of this issue. What I have posted, generally, aligns with the personal theory, thus far, I have formulated based on this research. While I may or may not agree with every point of every resource, those I post contain what appear to be logical reasoning and/or offer food for thought that has largely been ignored, suppressed and vilified from most media, to the general peril of ALL Humanity. Certainly alternative treatments, no matter how safe and effective, are largely discounted, if not outright suppressed.[size=11px][SEE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tn_b4NRTB6k <- "COVID, Ivermectin, and the Crime of the Century: DarkHorse Podcast with Pierre Kory & Bret Weinstein" & https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/treatments/hydroxychloroquine/treatment-protocols/ <- "Treatment Protocols" [/size]] This suppression is directly due to the fact the experimental gene-therapies being heavily promoted worldwide are typically done under Emergency Use Authorizations (EUA) such as the one [url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGkwaESsGBQ]issued by the FDA[/url] in the States, that is based on the assumption that no effective treatments exist, so to investigate or allow discussion of alternatives to the jabs would negate the justification for the EUA and should end the rollout (though, given the billions of dollars in profit the jabs [url=https://www.phe.gov/Preparedness/legal/prepact/Pages/default.aspx]guarantee[/url] their makers, it is unlikely even the admission of effective treatments would stop the experiment).
[quote]"When we give government the power to make medical decisions for us, we in essence accept that the state owns our bodies.” [b]– Former Senator, Dr. Ron Paul[/b][/quote]
[size=20px]I was told that this was the place for the discussion, now you're saying I shouldn't post links here??? I have refrained, as [i]"requested"[/i], from posting links in "Live Chat" and have typically posted the link to this forum thread and had any ensuing related discussions [b]in chat of games, in which I was participating[/b], [/size]
[img]https://cdn.minds.com/fs/v1/thumbnail/1212251376322007040/large/[/img]
[b]@[user]Cireon[/user], I read/viewed the resources you linked (and some linked from them, of course) but I would venture a guess you haven't investigated any I have posted.
Try these:
“Statement On Virus Isolation” by Dr. Kaufman et al https://www.andrewkaufmanmd.com/sovi/
"Dr. Roger Hodkinson on how governments responded to COVID" https://www.bitchute.com/video/zmqyDHO0At8g/ ([url=https://gbdeclaration.org/]this[/url] is mentioned therein)
“The Creation of a False Pandemic” by [url=https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/category/covid/]Jon Rappoport[/url] https://www.bitchute.com/video/Mt3oJ02N7l5z/
""Proof the Covid-19 `Vaccine’ Programme Should be Stopped Now" by Dr. Vernon Coleman" https://www.vernoncoleman.com/shouldbestopped.htm
"The Anatomy of Covid-19 by Dr. Andrew Kaufman" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GWRbIIaPV78
"Doctors Around the World Issue Dire WARNING: DO NOT GET THE COVID VACCINE!!" https://www.bitchute.com/video/jrXKyaJP7Eq0/
"Dr Andrew Kaufman - COVID19 - London Real Interview 29APR20" https://www.bitchute.com/video/EK33HYPhRC5w/[/b]
[quote]“If you were to say, ‘If they could find this virus in you at all [you’re a “case”]…’ With PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody. It starts to make you believe in the sort of Buddhist notion that everything is contained in everything else…It doesn’t tell you that you’re sick, and it doesn’t tell you that the thing you ended up with, really, was going to hurt you or anything like that.” [b]- Dr. Kary Mullis, Nobel-Prize-winning inventor of the PCR test (currently the so-called “Gold Standard” test for the “virus”)[/b] https://www.bitchute.com/video/bR5HF0hNzZvI/[/quote]