(tl;dr below)
As response to all the complaints about dice, Vexer has done a lot of research into the dice and compared it to the real-life results on the internet and the dice are practically the same as the real dice. Most of these can be found in the first post of this thread and some others scattered around on the forums.
In all honesty, Vexer can show conclusive proof of the fact that the dice are right, while other people are only posting single cases. When talking "random", single cases can not prove anything!
You can try and tell him (us) that he is not right, but he has done anything he can to prove that he is right. It is the same as me telling you that roughly 50% of all coin flips will be heads, based on a simulation of one million coin flips and then shouting (*shouts* YES, SHOUTING!) that I am not right by doing ten coin flips in which the amount of heads is not exactly 5. (Fun fact: we actually did simulate a lot of coin flips with our pseudo-random generator
*click*)
So yeah, as mathematician I am all open for discussion about dice, but only with people that actually understand statistics, because most of you are just looking for a way to tunnel your frustrations on losing a game (*giggles*) on something you do not have in your own hands: the dice. And sure, I also do it sometimes, but I blame randomness itself and not malfunctioning code.
Please, everybody wanting to complain, look at
this page. Refresh it as much as you want to and then tell me again that the dice is wrong
and explain me why.
(tl;dr start reading here)
There is a difference between not liking randomness and telling us the dice are wrong. The first thing is something we will be working on after the more important tasks have been finished. The second thing is actually complete nonsense, as shown by de evidence in the first post.
(tl;dr below)
As response to all the complaints about dice, Vexer has done a lot of research into the dice and compared it to the real-life results on the internet and the dice are practically the same as the real dice. Most of these can be found in the first post of this thread and some others scattered around on the forums.
In all honesty, Vexer can show conclusive proof of the fact that the dice are right, while other people are only posting single cases. When talking "random", single cases can not prove anything!
You can try and tell him (us) that he is not right, but he has done anything he can to prove that he is right. It is the same as me telling you that roughly 50% of all coin flips will be heads, based on a simulation of one million coin flips and then shouting (*shouts* YES, SHOUTING!) that I am not right by doing ten coin flips in which the amount of heads is not exactly 5. (Fun fact: we actually did simulate a lot of coin flips with our pseudo-random generator [url=http://www.dominating12.com/forums/coin_flip.php]*click*[/url])
So yeah, as mathematician I am all open for discussion about dice, but only with people that actually understand statistics, because most of you are just looking for a way to tunnel your frustrations on losing a game (*giggles*) on something you do not have in your own hands: the dice. And sure, I also do it sometimes, but I blame randomness itself and not malfunctioning code.
Please, everybody wanting to complain, look at [url=http://www.dominating12.com/forums/dice.php]this page[/url]. Refresh it as much as you want to and then tell me again that the dice is wrong [b]and explain me why[/b].
(tl;dr start reading here)
[b][i]There is a difference between not liking randomness and telling us the dice are wrong. The first thing is something we will be working on after the more important tasks have been finished. The second thing is actually complete nonsense, as shown by de evidence in the first post.[/i][/b]
“This is how humans are: We question all our beliefs, except for the ones that we really believe in, and those we never think to question.”
- Speaker for the Dead, O.S. Card