misunderstood
Another way to look at it would be to consider rating in the same way that rating is awarded to winners during regular games; richierich has highest rating so would get lowest rating points for the wins, gameplayer has second highest rating so would get second highest rating for the wins, misunderstood has lowest rating, so would get highest rating for the wins. Again giving:
1st: misunderstood
2nd: gameplayer
3rd: richierich
Actually, that math is not entirely fair, since each win was against different pools of opponents, each having different rating. However, if adding up the rating awarded for each actual win, the order still comes out the same:
misunderstood: 507 rating points
gameplayer: 477 rating points
richierich: 437 rating points
OK, now I really, really have to get to what I should be spending my time on! LOL.
[quote=misunderstood]Another way to look at it would be to consider rating in the same way that rating is awarded to winners during regular games; richierich has highest rating so would get lowest rating points for the wins, gameplayer has second highest rating so would get second highest rating for the wins, misunderstood has lowest rating, so would get highest rating for the wins. Again giving:
1st: misunderstood
2nd: gameplayer
3rd: richierich
[/quote]
Actually, that math is not entirely fair, since each win was against different pools of opponents, each having different rating. However, if adding up the rating awarded for each actual win, the order still comes out the same:
misunderstood: 507 rating points
gameplayer: 477 rating points
richierich: 437 rating points
OK, now I really, really have to get to what I should be spending my time on! LOL.