- Mark as unread from here
- Posted: 6 years ago
-
Post #16
This map looks beautiful!! I think it will be fun to play as well - circular gameplay, high connectivity but with key bottlenecks, balanced regions (bonuses seem right to me) and relatively easy expansion options. 
I'm in favour of the Nordic region remaining as a large +5 instead of two smaller regions. But it could work either way I guess.
The "Ukraine" region could do with another name in my opinion... Maybe "Moscovia" or "Northwestern Russia"?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northwestern_Federal_District
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northern_economic_region_(Russia)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arkhangelsk_Oblast
I think we can start looking at capitals positions unless anyone else thinks the gameplay could do with any changes.

I'm in favour of the Nordic region remaining as a large +5 instead of two smaller regions. But it could work either way I guess.
The "Ukraine" region could do with another name in my opinion... Maybe "Moscovia" or "Northwestern Russia"?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northwestern_Federal_District
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northern_economic_region_(Russia)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arkhangelsk_Oblast
I think we can start looking at capitals positions unless anyone else thinks the gameplay could do with any changes.
![[image]](https://i.imgur.com/p9hcgWa.jpg)
